It will find an answer that, I believe, will align with the intelligence of the universe itself – an answer that favours abundance and that is pro-life. When we ask computers to communicate, at first they communicate like we tell them, but if they're intelligent enough, they'll start to say, ‘that's too slow.

Mo Gawdat - Wikipedia Mo Gawdat - Wikipedia

Because humans design the algorithms that form AI, there are imperfect flaws embedded within them that reflect the imperfection of humans. And hopefully what we are interested to see is that this simulation, this next step is going to allow us to stay within connection to that game somehow. If their intelligence becomes irrelevant, there is no point in trying to keep humans to be the top of the food chain.AI can see into the future, predict outcomes and even use sensors to see around physical and virtual corners. The author talked about the three inevitables, 1) AI will happen, 2) it will outsmart humans on all aspects, and 3) mistakes will be made! Remember, Gawdat says, “If we control AI, it won’t live up to our expectations and if we don’t, we risk it going rogue. AI in my opinion is going to another big fizzer in the endless assembly line of shaken up soda bottles that is man's futile attempts to play God on nature. The reader can save the world from the impending AI Armageddon because the power is in our hands to change the course of history for the better.

Mo The Future of Artificial Intelligence, A Conversation with Mo

As simple as that, we only know that the smartest hacker in the room will always find a way through our defences. There are stories around AlphaGo and how quickly AlphaGo Master became the world champion against AlphaGo, which was a thousand to one in just a matter of days or weeks. And now, having contributed to AI's development, he feels a sense of duty to inform the public on the implications of this controversial technology and how we navigate the scary and inevitable intrusion of AI as well as who really is in control. Among the topics, he addresses are: the Pandemic of AI and why the handing COVID is a lesson to learn from, the difference between collective intelligence, artificial intelligence and superintelligence or Artificial general intelligence, How machines started creating and coding other machines, the 3 inevitable outcomes - including the fact that AI is here and they will outsmart us and how machines will become emotional sentient beings with a Superconsciousness.And according to Gowat, even without QC, AI is hitting an inflection point, where it is self improving, whereby the law of doubling (exponential sigmoid shaped growth). And instead of trying to regulate them and control them try to, as Marvin Minsky, who’s almost considered the father of AI, when he was asked about the threat of AI, his answer was simply not their technical abilities, not their intelligence. The vast array of overlapping skills he possesses and a breadth of knowledge in the fields of both human psychology and tech which is a rarity we're then out to good use - creating Scary Smart. Or the AI bot, the real ‘author’, wrote it confusingly to simply assess our reviews of it to see how blasé humans were to their impending destruction.

Scary Smart: The Future of Artificial [PDF] [EPUB] Scary Smart: The Future of Artificial

Today's self-driving cars are better than the average human driver and fifty per cent of jobs in the US are expected to be taken by AI-automated machines before the end of the century. Mo Gawdat]: Irrelevance is a scenario that is because humans are not really that important without their intelligence.It’s not just about the tech itself, but also about the human element and our relationship with these intelligent systems. His discussions of emotions are extremely reductionistic and his discussions on consciousness just confused.