However, if you simply refuse to go analog, there’s always digital. iMindMap is the software created by Tony Buzan, so it is stated to follow the 7 laws the best. But if you are looking for free software, there are many options. Without having a lot of personal experience, and with how frequently new ones seem to be coming out, I can’t make a proper recommendation one way of the other. Don’t Procrastinate Daley BJ, Torre DM: Concept maps in medical education: An analytical literature review. Med Educ. 2010, 44: 440-448. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03628.x. West DC, Pomeroy JR, Park JK, Gerstenberger EA, Sandoval J: Critical thinking in graduate medical education: A role for concept mapping assessment?. JAMA. 2000, 284: 1105-1110. 10.1001/jama.284.9.1105.

D'Antoni A, Pinto Zipp G, Olson V: Interrater reliability of the mind map assessment rubric in a cohort of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2009, 9: 19-10.1186/1472-6920-9-19. Proven – new edition of this very well-received and successful book which has helped thousands of medical students around the world to exam success using mind maps, an established tool in education and known to improve memory recall In this quasi-experimental study, 131 first-year medical students were randomly assigned to a standard note-taking (SNT) group or mind map (MM) group during orientation. Subjects were given a demographic survey and pre-HSRT. They were then given an unfamiliar text passage, a pre-quiz based upon the passage, and a 30-minute break, during which time subjects in the MM group were given a presentation on mind mapping. After the break, subjects were given the same passage and wrote notes based on their group (SNT or MM) assignment. A post-quiz based upon the passage was administered, followed by a post-HSRT. Differences in mean pre- and post-quiz scores between groups were analyzed using independent samples t-tests, whereas differences in mean pre- and post-HSRT total scores and subscores between groups were analyzed using ANOVA. Mind map depth was assessed using the Mind Map Assessment Rubric (MMAR). Results Mind maps were created by memory champion Tony Buzan. Even he will state that “created” is a strong term. He researched study-skills, history, and psychology to put together the best conglomeration of tactics to make a simple and effective memory device. He created the 7 steps (“ 7 laws”) of Mind Maps, which can be found here. Getting StartedFlexible – ideal primer when coming to a topic for the first time, when reviewing it at the end of a module or attachment, and for making project and revision plans

Once you have the basic process down, you can create your first mind map. To get started, you’ll need a writing utensil and a piece of paper. If you want something more flexible and fun, try an online mind mapping tool. With a web-based tool, you have the ability to customize your mind map to meet your specific needs and access it from anywhere at any time. If you’re more interested in art than science, you can ignite your creativity by showcasing your findings in a mind map. This free template is an excellent example of a lab report mind map. Copy it to your MindMeister account to start creating lab reports that are functional and fun to create. 13. Grammar mind map judgement, their knowledge of the patient’s medical history, relevant manufacturer’s instructions and the appropriate best The primary purpose of this study was to investigate whether a relationship existed between the mind map learning strategy and critical thinking, as measured with the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT), and whether this relationship was stronger than one between the preferred learning strategy of standard note-taking (SNT) and critical thinking. The HSRT reports an overall numerical score and 5 subscales: analysis, inference, evaluation, deductive reasoning, and inductive reasoning. The operational definitions of these subscales, adapted from a previous Delphi study, [ 14] follow: analysis (ability to identify the intended and actual inferential relationships among statements, questions, concepts, descriptions or other forms of representation intended to express beliefs, judgments, experiences, reasons, information or opinions); inference (ability to identify and secure elements needed to draw reasonable conclusions; to form conjectures and hypotheses, to consider relevant information and to educe the consequences flowing from data, statements, principles, evidence, judgments, beliefs, opinions, concepts, descriptions, questions, or other forms of representation); evaluation (ability to state the results of one's reasoning; to justify that reasoning in terms of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological and contextual considerations upon which one's results were based; and to present one's reasoning in the form of cogent arguments); deductive reasoning (assumed truth of the premises purportedly necessitates the truth of conclusion and this includes traditional syllogisms, as well as, algebraic, geometric, and set-theoretical proofs in mathematics); and inductive reasoning (an argument's conclusion is purportedly warranted, but not necessitated, by the assumed truth of its premises and this includes scientific confirmation and experimental disconfirmation)[ 31].

Adaptable – use the maps in the book directly, as a guide to prepare your own or a supplement to personal notes Since critical thinking is dependent upon both content (domain) knowledge and problem familiarity,[ 15] mind mapping may facilitate critical thinking because it fosters student retention of factual information, as well as relationships between concepts[ 25]. Currently, however, there are no data to support the hypothesis that mind maps facilitate critical thinking in medical students. Purpose of the study Barrows HS: Practice-based Learning: Problem-based Learning Applied to Medical Education. 1994, Springfield: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine The book features over 100 easy to follow, full colour mind maps of clinically relevant medical conditions using a systems-based structure: ity or liability for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publishers wish to make clear that any views or opinions