The ISOMETRICTM technology equalizes the length of the main and cross strings in the string bed, enlarging the sweet spot for consistent accuracy even on off-center hits. In the middle, there’s the Tour-version which is slightly more affordable than the Pro but follows a similar set of specs and requires a higher skill level (like the Pro) than the Play to enjoy playing with. The single-pass grommet hole construction offers a high-performance stringing pattern, providing more grommet holes for optimal stringing. My clears were sailing to the rear court with relative ease. As you would expect from a Yonex racquet, there is minimal torsion which meant that when I hit slightly off centre the shuttle still flew true – this is very important when testing racquets. Overall I was delighted with the power from the clear. Smash is easy, very accurate, controlled, and forgiving a well, I would say it’s better than Arcsaber 10. Don’t expect a smash that’s powerful and solid like Yonex Voltric Z Force 2, but then for sure, it’s also much more forgiving. Mid Court and Net Area Performance

Strategically positioned at the sides of the racquet, CS Carbon Nanotubes enhance the frame's elasticity. This technology improves durability and flexibility, helping the frame return to its original shape faster. The result is enhanced control at the point of impact, giving you an edge in every shot. CS Carbon Nanotube:** Enhanced durability and flexibility improve frame elasticity for better control at impact. One way to look at it is that it helps you hit and guide the shuttle towards where you want it to, which if you’re only looking to hammer shots off, might not matter as much to you.Arcsaber 11 feels relatively even-balanced in the swing but it certainly has a touch weight in the head. It’s just enough to know where the head is without being too much for those players that enjoy an even balance racquet.

If you are interested in exploring the user guide, you can find it here. Features – What We Found Lightweight and ManeuverableThe beauty of the even balance and lighter headed racquets is that they tend to be that little bit faster when playing drop shots, which ultimately provides additional disguise on drop shots. Slice and reverse slice shots tend to move a little faster and take less effort. The downside is that a heavier headed racquet such as Voltric 80 or Z Force has a more solid hitting platform due to the weight and therefore provides a greater degree of feel. Another thing, string tension. I’ve tried racquets strung at 24 and 25 and I just don’t like it. I’ve been hesitating between 26 and 27, which one would the AS11 support better? Coming right off of testing the powerful Yonex Astrox 100 Game, I wasn’t expecting much power but I was pleasantly surprised right from the start as lifts and clears were nice and easy without being a complete powerhouse. Not as easy as with the Astrox 100 Game but certainly respectable.

The Arcsaber 7 Play’s more flexible shaft makes it suitable for beginners, whereas the Arcsaber 11 Play is for you if your technique is around the intermediate level. Yonex Arcsaber 11 Play vs. Astrox 77 PlayT-ANCHOR: Góc chữ T của vợt được sử dụng vật liệu mới T-Anchor giúp giảm mô-men xoắn dư thừa khi cú đánh lệch tâm. In 2013 Yonex surprised us all by launching two additional racquets in the Arcsaber range, namely Arcsaber 11 and the unusually named Flashboost. Many Yonex followers were expecting to see a scaled down Arcsaber range in 2013 on the premise that this is the next range to be withdrawn and a new successor announced. Players who wanted a similar version of Arcsaber 10 may be disappointed. The testing sample I used was weighed 88g and around 100g before and after putting on the strings and grip.